int_slide1.jpg

"As President of the Michigan State Auctioneers Association, I have had the opportunity to work with The Gallagher Law Firm on providing educational opportuniti...

Read More


For More Information

Fill out my online form.
Home / Firm Blog / Banking/Credit Unions / Bill Schuette against the Frank Dodd Act
24
September
2012

Bill Schuette against the Frank Dodd Act

Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has joined the Attorneys General of South Carolina and Oklahoma, along with private party plaintiff’s Competitive Enterprise Institute, State National Bank of Big Spring, and the 60-Plus Association in challenging the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”), which was signed into law on July 21, 2010. The suit specifically alleges that:

  • Title X’s delegation of power to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) to prevent “unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices in connection with … offering of a consumer financial product or service” violates the Constitution’s separation of powers;
  • The President’s “recess appointment” of Richard Cordray as the CFPB Director violates the Constitution’s Appointments Clause because the Senate was not technically recessed when Cordray was appointed;
  • Title I’s grant of power to the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) violates separation of powers because it grants “effectively unlimited power” to the FSOC without the availability of meaningful judicial review by entities determined by the FSOC to be “systemically important” (i.e. “too big to fail”) of by their competitors; and
  • Title II’s grant of “Orderly Liquidation Authority” to the Treasury Secretary violates separation of powers, the Constitution’s Due Process Clause, and is unconstitutional because it constitutes a non-uniform law of bankruptcy.

According to the complaint, the State National Bank of Big Spring is a Texas Community Bank which opened in 1909 and has three locations. The plaintiffs allege that these provisions of the Act have injured the bank by imposing burdensome requirements and has created an environment of regulatory uncertainty, which has lead the bank to discontinue offering certain loans.

A copy of the plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief can be found here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/106497362/Dodd-Frank-Challenge-First-Amended-Complaint.

The Gallagher Law Firm is committed to providing quality and cost effective service to Michigan’s community bankers. For any of your banking law needs please contact Pat Gallagher.

Author; David J. Williams Categories: Banking/Credit Unions

About the Author

David J. Williams

David J. Williams

David began serving as a Law Clerk at the Gallagher Law Firm while in his last term at the Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Lansing, Michigan and continues as he awaits the results of his bar exam.  Prior to attending law school, David served as the Communications Director for a large mid-Michigan non-profit organization.  David has excelled in law school, earning a position in the top ten percent of his class.  He has actively participated in Moot Court, Law Review, and other student organizations.  He has received numerous awards and honors including several Certificates of Merit (i.e. Book Awards) and being named to the Dean’s list and Honor Roll every term.

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

You are commenting as guest.